Xbench

Comparison Site

current version: 1.3
System IndexFrequently Asked Questions

System Index

Systems Listed: 97649

 
System Type# of SystemsAverage Score
Apple TV64105.48
eMac37237.04
eMac (USB 2.0)36346.25
iBook (Fruit)8318.71
iBook (White)57617.55
iMac (Core 2)5129130.01
iMac (CRT)44213.36
iMac (Flat Panel)75735.16
iMac (Intel)3545122.51
iMac G5155663.02
Intel Developer Transition Sys... 537598.73
Mac mini128446.72
Mac mini (Intel)355394.93
Mac Pro8611156.06
MacBook548685.28
MacBook (Core 2)691193.39
MacBook Pro630089.97
MacBook Pro (Core 2)7862107.17
PowerBook G3 (Lombard)7327.64
PowerBook G3 (Pismo)34815.32
PowerBook G3 (Wallstreet)2014.77
PowerBook G4 (Al)487742.52
PowerBook G4 (Ti)71229.07
PowerMac G3 (B&W)48016.03
PowerMac G3 (Beige)14714.31
PowerMac G4 (Cube)55033.96
PowerMac G4 (Digital Audio)115242.72
PowerMac G4 (Gigabit)80832.90
PowerMac G4 (MDD)205055.33
PowerMac G4 (QuickSilver)168244.34
PowerMac G4 (Sawtooth)128732.86
PowerMac G4 (Yikes!)10420.72
PowerMac G5 (June 2004)247199.78
PowerMac G5 (Late 2004)29381.43
PowerMac G5 (Late 2005)1681121.34
PowerMac G5 (Orig)150182.71
Xserve2179.98
Xserve G550101.81
Xserve Intel177133.32
Unknown Type754199.22

Recent Comments

PosterSystemComment
Lew Z933MHz Quicksilver 2002XBench's Open GL tests only serve to test whether a card supports OGL, not how fast it is - this test is orders of magnitude too simple for that. Try a UT4 flyby and look @the FPS there. The same is true but to a lesser extent for the Quartz and UI tests.
HecabeHecabe’s 945GZM-S2Creo que me baja bastante el Score por las Gráficas (nVidia 7300 128 mb). Y porque esta Mother Board tiene 533 mhz, le doy overclock para que corra a 667 Mhz.
hxrurgvwzegMacBook ProWBzlwk <a href="http://zbtzgzmdakqn.com/">zbtzgzmdakqn</a>, [url=http://cnkefqgudvck.com/]cnkefqgudvck[/url], [link=http://aixoepusvvkv.com/]aixoepusvvkv[/link], http://oxbtdjhioxut.com/
Mines in Red17" 2.6GhzMan I Love Leopard 
This machine's owner933MHz Quicksilver 2002 I cannot understand why my GeForce 6200 w/256MB ram is being consistently outperformed by 32 and 64MB stock GeForces.

I bought the 6200 for leopard core image compatibility but leopard refused to recognise my Acard Raid 66 card (no help whatsoever from Acard's crap website, they barely support Tiger let alone leopard...) so I went back to Tiger.

Does anyone have any ideas why this card (which supposedly should p*ss all over 2mx/4mx's) is performing so badly?

Valid XHTML 1.1!